Comparisons
Augment Code vs Cline
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
Augment Code vs Cline
| Feature | Augment Code | Cline |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding Agents | Coding Agents |
| Pricing | Paid (Contact) | Open Source Best Value |
| Rating | 8.6 /10 Top Rated | 8.6 /10 |
| Deep codebase Context Engine (full repo indexing) | — | |
| Autonomous multi-file agent for large refactors | — | |
| AI completion with repo-wide awareness | — | |
| RAG-based smart context retrieval | — | |
| VS Code and JetBrains integration | — | |
| Enterprise security and SOC2 compliance | — | |
| Team collaboration and shared context | — | |
| Autonomous multi-file editing in VS Code | — | |
| Terminal command execution | — | |
| Headless browser control for testing changes | — | |
| Model Context Protocol (MCP) support | — | |
| Checkpoints to rewind to previous states | — | |
| Bring-your-own-key for Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, local models | — |
Which is better: Augment Code or Cline?
Both are excellent tools — your choice depends on specific needs:
A
Augment Code
Choose Augment Code if you
- API ✓
- Features 9.0
- Performance 9.0
- Support 8.5
C
Cline
Choose Cline if you
- Free / Open Source
- Self-Host ✓
- GitHub ★50,000
- Value for Money 9.0