Comparisons
Make (Integromat) vs n8n
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
Make (Integromat) vs n8n
| Feature | Make (Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity Agents | Productivity Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium ($10.59) | Freemium (Free (self-hosted)) |
| Rating | 6.5 /10 | 8.7 /10 Top Rated |
| Visual scenario builder | — | |
| 1,800+ integrations | — | |
| Data transformation | — | |
| Conditional logic | — | |
| Scheduler | — | |
| Visual node-based workflow editor | — | |
| AI agent builder (LangChain nodes) | — | |
| 400+ pre-built integrations | — | |
| Self-hostable (Community Edition free) | — | |
| Custom code (JavaScript) nodes | — | |
| Vector store & memory support | — | |
| Execution logs & debugging | — | |
| Credential management & Git versioning | — |
Which is better: Make (Integromat) or n8n?
Both are excellent tools — your choice depends on specific needs:
M
Make (Integromat)
Choose Make (Integromat) if you
- Teams who want a visually intuitive automation platform with powerful logic capabilities and extensive integrations
n
n8n
Choose n8n if you
- Summary: 8.7/10 vs 6.5/10
- Self-Host ✓
- GitHub ★60,000
- Ease of Use 8.5
- Value for Money 8.9