Comparisons
Cursor vs Windsurf
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
Cursor vs Windsurf
| Feature | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Coding Agents | Coding Agents |
| Pricing | Freemium ($20) | Paid (Contact) |
| Rating | 8.8 /10 Top Rated | 7.6 /10 |
| AI Tab completion with codebase context | ||
| Agent mode with terminal and multi-file editing | — | |
| Composer for coordinating changes across files | — | |
| Multi-model routing (Claude, GPT, Gemini) | — | |
| Cloud background agents for long-running tasks | — | |
| Full VS Code extension compatibility | — | |
| Model Context Protocol (MCP) support | — | |
| Cascade for multi-step, multi-file code edits | — | |
| Agentic workflow — describe goals, AI plans and executes | — | |
| Full Anthropic Claude model integration | — | |
| VS Code-based editor with extension compatibility | — | |
| Enterprise features (SSO, policy controls) | — |
Which is better: Cursor or Windsurf?
Both are excellent tools — your choice depends on specific needs:
C
Cursor
Choose Cursor if you
- Summary: 8.8/10 vs 7.6/10
- Ease of Use 9.0
- Value for Money 8.5
- Features 9.0
- Performance 9.0
W
Windsurf
Choose Windsurf if you
- Existing Windsurf users and teams evaluating Cognition Labs' full AI engineering stack