Cursor
Verified ★ FeaturedThe AI-native code editor built on VS Code
Released
2023
Country
United States
API
N/A
Self-Host
No
Monthly Active Users
10M+
Funding
Series D
Last Updated
2026-06
About Cursor
Verdict
The AI-native IDE that won the 2025 market — VS Code familiarity with frontier-model intelligence at every editing surface. If you want AI baked into your editor rather than running alongside it, Cursor is the default choice. Pricing scales steeply for power users, but the free and Pro tiers are competitive.
Features
Detailed Ratings
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Familiar VS Code foundation — extensions and settings transfer instantly
- Best-in-class Tab completion that predicts multi-line, multi-cursor edits
- Frontier model choice: route to Claude, GPT, or Gemini per task
- Cloud agents offload long tasks to run in the background
- Strong commercial momentum — one of the fastest-growing dev tools in 2025
Cons
- Pro tier has usage limits; heavy users hit caps and need Pro+ or Ultra
- Cloud agents require an internet connection and consume credits fast
- Desktop-only — no terminal or web version
Use Cases
Who Is It For?
Developers who want AI integrated into every part of their IDE workflow, with model choice and cloud agents
Pricing Plans
Hobby
- 2,000 completions and 50 premium requests per month
- VS Code extension compatibility
Pro
- Unlimited completions
- 500 fast premium requests
- Full agent and Composer access
- MCP support
Pro+
- 3x the usage of Pro
- Priority access to frontier models
Ultra
- 20x the usage of Pro
- Cloud agents and priority compute
- Early access to new capabilities
Business
- Centralized billing
- Admin controls and SSO
- Shared rules and privacy mode
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Cursor just VS Code with AI?
It is a fork of VS Code (so your extensions work), but the AI integration is deep rather than bolted on. Cursor owns the Tab, Chat, Composer, and Agent surfaces at the editor level, which a VS Code extension cannot match.
How does Cursor compare to Claude Code?
Cursor is an IDE; Claude Code is a terminal agent. Many developers use both — Cursor for interactive editing and Claude Code for hands-off terminal tasks. Cursor's strength is in-editor UX; Claude Code's strength is autonomous execution and 1M-token context.
What models can I use?
Pro and above can route between Claude (Sonnet, Opus), GPT, and Gemini models. The choice is per-message or per-task, so you can match the model to the workload.
Related Agents
Windsurf
Coding Agents
The agentic AI IDE acquired by Cognition Labs and merging into Devin
JetBrains AI Assistant
Coding Agents
Deeply integrated AI coding assistant built into the JetBrains IDE ecosystem
Tabnine
Coding Agents
Enterprise-grade AI coding assistant with privacy-first architecture and air-gapped deployment
ZCode
Coding Agents
Z.ai's agentic coding IDE that turns GLM models into plan-code-review-deploy workflows
Top Alternatives
Compare with these similar tools
Links & Resources
Profiles are AI-assisted from public information — not independently hands-on tested.